Home  
Upcoming Conferences  
2010/10 Patent Litigation XI
2010/10 Antitrust Law & Litigation XII
To Register  
Past Conferences  
2010/10 Antitrust Law & Litigation XII
2010/10 Patent Litigation XI
2010/04 Complex Litigation XII - The Future of Civil Litigation: Legislative and Behavioral Changes
2010/01 EDiscovery Dispute Resolution Program For
Special Masters & Mediators
2009/10 Antitrust Law & Litigation XI
2009/10 Patent Litigation X
2009/04 Complex Litigation XI: The Attorney-Client Privilege: Rule 502, Selective Waiver, Privilege Logs & Related Issues.
2008/10 Patent Litigation IX
2008/09 Antitrust Law & Litigation X: The Globalisation of Antitrust Enforcement
2008/04 Complex Litigation X - Health Law & Medical Products Litigation: Common Ground
2007/10 Antitrust Law & Litigation IX
2007/10 Patent Litigation VIII
2007/04 Complex Litigation IX: The Attorney-Client Privilege
2006/10 Antitrust Law & Litigation
2006/10 Patent Litigation
2006/05 Mass Torts
2005/11 Antitrust Law & Litigation
2005/10 Patent Litigation
2005/04 Litigating Mass Torts
2004/11 Antitrust Law & Litigation VI
2004/10 Patent Litigation V
2004/03 Complex Litigation VI
2003/11 Antitrust Law & Litigation
2003/11 Patent Litigation
2003/05 Digital Privacy And Security
2003/04 Complex Litigation V
2002/11 Antitrust Law & Litigation
2002/11 Patent Litigation
2002/05 Health Law & Litigation
2002/05 Complex Litigation
2001/11 Patent Litigation
2001/11 Antitrust Law & Litigation
2001/05 The Internet: Privacy, Property & Regulation
2001/04 Complex Litigation
2000/11 Patent Litigation
2000/11 Antitrust: Law & Litigation
Raves  
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
About Us  
Mission
FAQ
Advisory Board
Executive Director
Contact Us
Sponsors  
Working Group Series  
Information
Application
WGS Audio Update Series  
TSC Institute  
RFP+/eDiscovery Vendors  
Mission
Vendor Panel
Open Invitation
Speaker's Bureau  
The Journal  
Publications  
Past Newsletters  
Spring 2008 Newsletter
Fall_2007_Newsletter
Newsletter 2007 Winter
Newsletter 2006 Summer
Newsletter 2006 Winter
Newsletter 2005 Fall
Newsletter 2005 January
Newsletter 2005 Winter
Newsletter 2004 Fall
Newsletter 2004 Summer
Photos  
AT08 in Florence, Italy
Sedona Photos
Conference Photos
Data Deluge Summit
Contact Us  

    
Limitations on Privilege Waiver Under New Federal Rule of Evidence 502

November 25, 2008     03:00pm - 04:00pm Eastern


Agenda


Panelists


In September, Congress passed, and the President signed, Senate Bill 2450, which enacted new Federal Rule of Evidence 502. This is the first change in the federal rules dealing with evidential privileges since they were first enacted more than 30 years ago. It represents a significant assertion of federal court authority in what has been traditionally an area for state courts and legislatures. But these strong protections for attorney-client privilege were necessitated by the tremendous growth in the volume and complexity of document and electronic discovery, which made conventional privilege review unduly expensive and fraught with dangers of inadvertent disclosure, leading to forfeiture of privilege. At the same time, uncertainty about the consequences of inadvertent disclosure, particularly in multi-jurisdictional cases, prevented litigants from making agreements or utilizing technologies that could reduce the cost of privilege review.

The enactment of Fed. R. Evid. 502 occurs two years after the adoption of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5), which allows litigants to enter into agreements between themselves regarding the consequences of inadvertent disclosure of privileged information, and in the wake of two significant opinions out of the District of Maryland, Hopson v. City of Baltimore and Victor Stanley v. CreativePipe, illustrating the dangers of privilege waiver and pointing out some of the practical problems litigants face in the very real world of discovery.

The Sedona ConferenceŽ Voices from the Desert webinar series is privileged (no pun intended) to bring together the two most influential figures in this rapidly-developing area of the law: Prof. Daniel J. Capra of Fordham University School of Law, reporter to the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence and principle drafter of Rule 502; and Hon. Paul W. Grimm, Chief Magistrate Judge of the District of Maryland, author of both the Hopson and Victor Stanley opinions. Joining the discussion will be Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carl J. West with questions and observations on how Rule 502 may affect state court litigation. This will be a unique opportunity for you to hear expert discussion on this new rule and its effect on state and federal litigation from the most authoritative sources, and to ask your own questions.

Pricing:

$79 Working Group Members of The Sedona Conference®

$99 General Public

Watch This Seminar Now!
CDs:
To purchase a CD of this program, please call 1-800-701-5161. Discounts
apply for program registrants.

We are NOT seeking MCLE accreditation for this program


Agenda   
Tuesday, Nov 25
Time              Session Panelists
03:00-03:50   Presentation
The law of "privilege waiver" leading up to Hopson v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 232 F.R.D. 238 (D. Md. 2005)

The conundrum presented by Fed. R. of Civ. P. 26(b)(5), "claw back" and "quick peek" agreements

The solution provided by Fed. R. Evid. 502

The scope of protection offered by Rule 502

The effect of Rule 502 on parallel or future litigation in state courts

The effect of Rule 502 on the way privilege review is done: Victor Stanley v. CreativePipe, 2008 WL 2221841 (D. Md. May 29, 2008)

The need for litigants to cooperate with each other and with the court to fully realize the benefits of Rule 502
   
03:45-04:00   Question and Answer Session    
 

Panelists   
Prof. Daniel Capra
Fordham University School of Law, New York, NY
Hon. Paul W. Grimm
Chief United States Magistrate Judge, Baltimore, MD
The Hon. Carl J. West
Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles, CA
Kenneth J. Withers
The Sedona Conference®, Phoenix, AZ